Other Links

Dead Man Walking

Finance Minister Morneau has a habit of walking from one political disaster to another- essentially stepping in one cow patty after another- and for no reason other than his own foolishness.

But behind his missteps lies a bigger issue and that is what did he tell the Prime Minister and what did he tell the Prime Minister’s closest and most senior advisors.

Every minister and Prime Minister, regardless of party affiliation will make some gaffe every now and then- certainly we have seen Trudeau and some key cabinet ministers make some good ones. Usually though it is a slip of the lip when being interviewed or flubbing the answer to a question in the House.

Morneau has taken making mistakes to a whole new level. Either he has poor quality ministerial advisors or he figures he is the smartest one in the room and he knows best. Having been a senior level political staffer for something like 13 years, I know that people who move up to that level are usually pretty good at what they do. That does suggest the minister look in the mirror at the author of his misfortune.

Having been the political staffer in charge of QP for 15 years in both government and opposition roles, I can say that I see Moreau as badly wounded, essentially a dead man walking. Senior PMO staff simply cannot allow this to go on much longer. No matter what channel changing issue they come up with, the finance minister has a habit of knocking those issues off of the front pages every single time.

Morneau is not just in trouble, he is ruining the image of the government while serving as a huge distraction and he keeps knocking the government off its daily message. Speaking from years of experience doing issues management in PMO, that can’t be allowed to go on much longer.

There are other key questions once you move beyond Morneau’s actions and they should focus on Justin himself. It is a simple question- When did he know and what did he do about it? What day did he first learn that Morneau had not set up a blind trust? Depending on that date, what did Trudeau do, suggest, or agree to let Morneau do? Did he know all along or was he sandbagged by his minister? The same questions apply to Trudeau’s most senior staff.

When did Trudeau first learn that Morneau had sold shares, not once but twice?  Did he approve of this not insignificant sale of shares? Did no one anticipate the current line of attack on Morneau? 

In every government, regardless of political affiliation, your finance minister has to be squeaky clean. In politics perception is reality to thousands of voters. Morneau’s self-inflicted wounds have hurt the government and certainly his own credibility.

While it is time to move him, don’t expect this government to act quickly in shuffling him aside. The general rule is to wait until the attacks are done; a holiday break from the House arrives and then do it. For appearances sake they will leave Morneau in place to swing from the noose that he put around his own neck. Such is life in politics. But in the end we all know where the buck stops and it is not on the desk of the minister, it is not on the desks of his ministerial staff nor the desks of Trudeau's senior advisors- the buck lands squarely on Trudeau’s desk. Will he move Morneau or not- that decision will tell us exactly what type of stuff this prime minister is made of; it will be fun to watch


Keeping Canadians Safe

When one takes the oath of office as Prime Minister or of Minister of Public Safety, it is implied that you will do your very best to keep Canada and Canadian men, women and children safe. This includes from both external threats and internal ones.

But if you are Justin Trudeau, you welcome back at last count some 64 battle hardened terrorists with gobbledygook about rehabilitating them. Trudeau’s own Public Safety minister admits that it is highly unlikely if these terrorists will ever be rehabilitated. Interviews that I have seen with experts in that rehabilitation process admit that at the maximum maybe 20% have a chance to be rehabilitated.

If we accept that figure then 80% or 52 terrorists cannot be helped and remain a threat. What happened to keeping Canadians safe?

What happened is some bleeding-heart Liberals decided to gamble with the lives of our citizens and allow these fighters to come back home, to wander our streets, to visit crowded shopping malls at Christmas etc. It is a crazy policy.

The way you stop this nonsense is to employ the same people who stopped the tax on small business.

Where are the enterprising reporters who will call every single Liberal backbencher to ask them if they agree with the Prime Minister and this policy?  And once you have those answers call every single Liberal riding President and ask them the same question. Let these Liberal MPs stand up and be counted. Let each Liberal MP, go on the record and state if they agree with allowing these terrorists to come home to enjoy the very freedoms that these fighters helped to savagely crush.

Then call every cabinet minister and ask them the same question and their riding presidents as well. I would bet most cabinet ministers will duck the question or grovel to keep their job and spout the same talking points as Trudeau. But, backbenchers have to get re-elected and the vast majority of them will be well tuned to how their voters feel on this issue. They need to get re-elected and that crunch is coming up in 2019.

I would suggest that how the Liberal MPs answer the question will make for some interesting copy and something that the media could have some fun with. A backbench revolt is the only way to deal with this issue as Trudeau is living in La-La land somewhere posing for selfies.


Shooting Yourself In The Foot

“Let’s keep shooting ourselves in the foot” should be the slogan for the Liberal Party over the last few days.

First bring in tax reforms that hurt small business owners and farmers; then scramble to find an out that tries to make you look good, while still protecting the family trusts of the rich like Trudeau and Moreau.

Second have the same minister who screwed up the tax reforms get caught owning a villa in France that he somehow had a lapse of memory about and oops he forget to declare it to the Ethics Commissioner.

Third, stories are out that the same minister did not put all of his shares and assets into a blind trust to avoid any potential conflicts of interest. I find that very interesting as one of my PMO staff owned one share in a company (it was a birthday gift) and he was ordered to either sell it or put the one share in a blind trust.

Fourth, just weeks before Remembrance Day ceremonies announce that ridings only deserve two wreaths, in spite of the fact that some ridings have several ceremonies. I can think of at least four in my riding. Then of course back track when everything hits the fan.

I guess Liberal ministers and their staff haven’t yet learnt that one of the unwritten rules for new ministers is to double check the policy proposals a department brings to you, especially if it represents a policy change. Ask to see the entire file, including ones that go back to previous governments. I can remember doing that and finding out that the policy presented to my minister as brand new; had in fact been rejected by the previous Conservative minister as well as several Liberal ministers.

Not a good couple of weeks for the Liberals as they have certainly handed the Conservatives and NDP plenty of ammunition to chip away at Liberal credibility.



Wouldn’t you know it; our finance minister got caught hiding a French villa.  Mind you, Morneau claims it is all a mistake, just a minor bit of forgetfulness.

I don’t know about you, but, I would certainly know if I had a villa and while most of us will never be as rich as Morneau, I am pretty sure you would remember if you had a cottage or maybe a winter home in Florida.

If this was Question Period, the real fun would be in keeping this alive for a bit longer. If you are an opposition party, it doesn’t hurt to pile onto an already damaged minister, wounded by his planned tax reforms and a horribly executed communication plan.

Let’s start with a few simple questions:

1. When did you last visit the villa?

2. How many days did you stay there?

3. How many times have you stayed at the villa?

4. Have members of your family used it?

5. As you own the villa through a corporation there should be records, letters or emails detailing when you stayed there, will you table those records in the House of Commons?

6. How many other villas or properties do you own outside of Canada? Will you table a complete list of them in the House?

Easy but fun questions to ask because each one casts doubt on the minister’s credibility and implies he is hiding something. Plus each one lays a trap- and his answers will give opposition researchers and good investigative reporter’s lots to research and double check on while shredding his credibility in the House. Any failure to completely answer these questions, any attempt to duck these questions, any use of dumb talk points simply makes the minister look worse.

If the opposition parties are up to their game, between his tax reform proposals and his missing villa, they could make it a week of hell for the finance minister. Plus any attempt to change the channel with a few minor tweaks of his tax reform package (a good news story) will get buried with negative villa stories. It could be fun in Question Period.




The Stage Is Set For 2019

With the NDP electing Jagmeet Singh as their new leader we have seen the stage set for an interesting federal election in 2019. In a way it is the passing of the political torch from the baby boomers to the younger generation.

Not only is Singh a match for Justin Trudeau on the charismatic meter, but he is also a smarter politician. Up until now Trudeau has pretty much had things his way with media coverage, especially that of the younger generation of reporters. Now he has competition. This will be interesting to watch as we move towards 2019.

The issue for the Conservatives will be how to garner media attention when the focus will be on the other two showboats. How will the Conservatives make dull and low key the alternative? This is not to say that they can’t. The Conservatives can present policies that are attractive and reflect what the voters want. They can be the opposite of the “spend my tax dollars” Liberals and NDP, but it will be a lot of work.

In the past the Conservatives have always benefited from a strong NDP, stealing votes from the Liberals. My attack team was often told to leave the NDP alone even when we had a good issue, and that included when in the election war room. During elections we could respond to individual riding requests, but there was no concerted effort to go after their national campaign or leader.

For the next week or so it will be all about Jagmeet Singh, the new kid on the block. After that things will level off and it will be back to the trenches for all three political leaders. The election in 2019 is still a long way away.

Page 1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... 88 Next 5 Entries »