Other Links

Is There Something to Hide?

So, what do the Liberals have to hide?

It certainly looks like they need to hide something when you consider how fast they shut down the emergency meeting of the Justice Committee.

At this point it looks like Trudeau has decided to double down and dig in and simply take his lumps on the SNC-Lavalin mess.

No doubt part of this is due to March break. There is no daily Question Period to give the opposition plenty of media coverage. Most voters are distracted, kids are home from school or the whole family is off on a holiday. Other than those in the Ottawa bubble, he is gambling most Canadians aren’t paying close attention at the moment. He is probably right.

In what has turned into “Round Two” of the SNC-Lavalin scandal, this is the first shoe to drop. What is the second?

Could it be bouncing the two former ministers from caucus? For all of the above reasons this is a good time to it. MPs are away, including those in his own caucus and by the time they return; any major media hits would be over. MPs can be reminded about who has to sign their nomination papers and either line up behind Trudeau or face the same as the former ministers. Judging by the parroting of Liberal talk points from ministers recently pledging their fealty to the PM; do you think there will be an outcry from sitting Liberal MPs?

Besides, there is always another story to change the channel- just look at the Boeing aircraft coverage today.

The best channel changer will be the budget and all of its pre-election goodies. Add in a few days of leaks around the budget and the Liberals can bury the former AG with other news. Then at the next few meetings of the Justice Committee the Liberal majority can keep shutting opposition motions down. After awhile it will get boring for all concerned, including the media.

As for all of the calls for a public inquiry that one is dead in the water. No Prime Minister facing what the Liberals are facing and knowing that the potential witness list would have to testify under oath will ever agree to one. A public inquiry is one more Opposition pipe dream.

It is not a bad gamble on his part providing more details around the SNC-Lavalin story and political interference don’t come out.

There are only 50 days of Question Period left and 10 of those are on a Friday, so really 40 days to worry about. With interest about to shift for a week or two to the budget, he could hang tough before the summer recess and the real election campaigning gears up.

Trudeau likes to surprise people and show how tough he can be- remember the boxing match.

Perhaps what we saw today was Trudeau trying to box himself out of a corner. The opposition will be hard pressed to prevent it.


Seriously- A Conservative Petition Supporting a Liberal MP?

As Preposterous as it sounds, we have a Conservative Party petition supporting a former Liberal cabinet minister who is still a sitting Liberal MP.

The covering note also suggests that the former Attorney-General speaks the truth- at least according to the Conservatives.

“Canadians need to hear from Jody Wilson-Raybould. Justin Trudeau must waive solicitor-client privilege so she can speak the truth.”

While I happen to be one of those who believe her, isn’t it a little early to have decided politically that only her side of the story is the truth? Aren’t there already demands for a public inquiry? Isn’t this petition stepping on that strategy? Who has a better chance of getting to the truth- a Justice Committee with a majority of Liberal MPs or a public inquiry with witnesses under oath?

How did the Conservatives come up with this petition idea? Seriously, who thought up and who approved of this petition?

Can you imagine Mulroney, Clark or Harper asking their team to put together a petition to support a sitting Liberal MP and former minister?

Outside of a short-term immediate media hit what did the Conservatives get out of this idea? 

Everyone in the media and in the Liberal Party know that the vast majority of those signing it are Conservative supporters hoping to embarrass Trudeau, especially as we all got an email asking us to go sign. So politically it is not that exciting, nor will it have any impact on Trudeau or the PMO.

It looks like it is part of a short-term strategy (which the Conservatives seem to have a habit of doing) to get another hit on the PM at almost any cost. Other examples include the very premature demand that Trudeau resign over SNC-Lavalin when we don’t know all the details.

Who in the OLO is looking at the potential long-range implications of the Conservative Party (Wilson-Raybould’s political opponents) declaring Wilson-Raybould speaks the truth?

Outside of the fact that we haven’t heard the whole story yet, stop and think long term too.

Try the “What If Game”.

What if Trudeau is defeated in October.

What if Trudeau actually does resign in the near future over this scandal?

What if the Liberals then hold a leadership convention and Jody Wilson-Raybould enters and wins and becomes the next Liberal PM?

The Conservative Party is on the record as saying that she can be counted on to speak the truth.

Now won’t that make for an interesting Question Period.





As the Liberals are once again plunged into damage control mode, I thought it would be fun to look back at previous comments.

February 28th

Can the Liberals leave an obviously upset MP, who has been widely quoted (with very damaging content) in caucus where she might inspire others to speak out as well? Probably not and a first step would be to remove her from caucus.

Remains an issue that Trudeau tries to sidestep each day compounded by the resignation of his second senior minister. He essentially waited too long to act. One ex-minister he could kick out of caucus, two he might have to live with them in caucus.

The clamor for the former AG to be allowed to speak fully and with no restrictions will build. Denying her that right makes the Liberals and the PM look guilty. That will play out over many weeks. The same is true with demands for a full public inquiry.

No change here and the situation worsens for the Liberals every day. The demand for a full public inquiry strengthens with each passing day and as more information comes out about the actions of PMO in the SNC-Lavalin case.

The committee will be demanding to see many more witnesses implicated in her testimony. A smart opposition can drag those requests out for weeks, even months- just look back at Shawinagate and the Sponsorship Scandal.

The Clerk has been recalled for further questioning and so he should be with many thinking he has compromised his position.

The other shoe that is still to drop is the Norman trial.

With many of the same government characters involved in this case, watch for it to get much more interesting this month.

[The Liberals] Run on climate change.

They can try to attract enough Green and NDP supporters to support a Liberal “Green Climate” push

A climate rally last night led by Trudeau and the first pre-election attack ads on climate change started yesterday. Pretty obvious where they are going on this one.

February 7, 2019

As for the two main stream federal parties, they need to wake up and smell the coffee too. Voters are tired of the same old policies and lack of vision. They are tired of the daily antics they see from both sides. They are tired of the name calling and mudslinging.

No change there in how the parties act and behave. However, there are quite a few voters who are disillusioned with both of the main parties. Do these people sit out the next election and not vote or do they cast a protest vote? That has happened recently in Quebec and previously in Ontario (how many remember waking up to a Bob Rae government?).

The Greens are polling at an all time high. 9.1% according to a recent Nanos poll. Where do disillusioned voters go? Not to the NDP that is pretty obvious. The Greens have an opportunity to be spoilers in October attracting NDP and Liberal voters. They still have the same problem though- voters see them as a one issue party and most voters have no idea what else the Greens offer. If a minority Liberal government is elected in October, the Greens can keep Trudeau in power.

January 1st, 2016

It takes time for a leader to fall from grace, play the long game.

An so it is playing out in front of us every day

December 29, 2015

Confusion, inept issue management and arrogance are not the way this was supposed to play out for the Liberals. Remember Trudeau is all about “sunny ways”. But even sunny ways have storm clouds on the horizon. This will be a fun year to follow politics.

While written way back in 2015, nothing can be more accurate about 2019


What comes Next? Perhaps a Snap election.

What an amazing day yesterday! A brutal day for the Liberal Party and especially staff in the PMO.

Jody Wilson-Raybould’s testimony was devastating and no matter how the Liberals now attempt to discredit her testimony and no matter how many attack dogs they send out to dispute what the former Attorney General stated- they can no longer win that argument.

This doesn’t leave the Liberals with too many choices.

Can the Liberals leave an obviously upset MP, who has been widely quoted (with very damaging content) in caucus where she might inspire others to speak out as well? Probably not and a first step would be to remove her from caucus.

Today Trudeau was out there pretending that he still had to watch all of her testimony while at the same time stating that he completely disagreed with everything she said. A bit of a contradiction there. But, this opens the door for him to delay a few days until the break week starts.

She could then be removed by stating that they reviewed her testimony and asked her to reaffirm publicly her confidence in the PM and the Finance minister etc and if she doesn’t, then out the door. Do it over the next two weeks when the MPs are off in their ridings. There will be an outcry of support for the former AG, but with a two week break ahead it will be muted.

The bigger issue going forward is what do the Liberals do leading up to the October election? They are boxed in with very few options, none of which are good ones.

The clamor for the former AG to be allowed to speak fully and with no restrictions will build. Denying her that right makes the Liberals and the PM look guilty. That will play out over many weeks. The same is true with demands for a full public inquiry.

The committee will be demanding to see many more witnesses implicated in her testimony. A smart opposition can drag those requests out for weeks, even months- just look back at Shawinagate and the Sponsorship Scandal.

The only option other than tossing present and former staff to the wolves is for the Liberals to repeatedly use their majority on the committee to prevent this from happening. Very bad optics for the Liberals. The Liberals will be pounded daily in the media on corruption and scandals leading up to the October election- they can’t afford to have that happen. (Note: Gerry Butts did ask the committee today if he could testify).

Even if Trudeau cleans house in PMO, fires the Clerk and any staff named by the former AG, it won’t help them. The last thing they need is bitter ex-staff deciding that they are willing to testify if only to get even with their former boss. Besides, at that point everyone is more interested in saving their own necks and reputations.

Whether or not the RCMP will get involved is another issue as for that matter is the Ethics Commissioner. Even without their final report or charges being laid, day by day voters will be reminded that investigations are underway. Most likely neither of those will be finalized by election day, leaving voters concerned and giving the opposition lots of fodder to attack and speculate about corruption in the PMO and government and the PM’s role in it.

The other shoe that is still to drop is the Norman trial. A lot of this will be out in the open in the weeks leading up to the October vote. We have already seen some of the games being played there with disclosure of documents and emails. It is another no win for the Liberals.

If they allow all of that to happen, in my opinion the Liberals won’t be able to weather the storm.

How do they go forward then? There is the ultimate channel changer available to them.

Call a snap election and change the channel to a fight over policy issues and try to bury this scandal and get out ahead of further revelations in the Norman trial as best as possible.

This will shut down the committee, the former AG will be replaced as the Liberal candidate and become a sideline player, perhaps an independent candidate, who will spend her time trying to win her own seat.

They have the opportunity with the budget on March 19th. First offer new funding to all sorts of special interest groups to buy their public support. Next, talk up the economic success they have had.

Then put a poison pill in the budget that will give them an excuse to say there is a crisis and they need a new mandate. For example, put a nation- wide compulsory carbon tax in the budget with an implementation date of July 1st or sooner. When there is the expected outcry from the provinces that are opposed to it- state that you have a crisis, call the election and take your chances.

Run on climate change. Remember the line in Gerry Butts, Trudeau’s former top advisor’s resignation letter- “Our kids and grandkids will judge us on one issue above all others. That issue is climate change. I hope the response to it becomes the collective, non-partisan, urgent effort that science clearly says is required. I hope that happens soon.”

Try to make the election about saving the environment and a strong economy (as would have been outlined in their budget document).

They can frame it as the doom and gloom anti-immigrant, no vision, extreme right-wing Conservatives versus a Liberal party with a green vision of the future and a vision of making Canada a better place for our children.

They can try to attract enough Green and NDP supporters to support a Liberal “Green Climate” push and once again try to get young voters out to support the Liberals on an issue that younger voters support, perhaps even a few older ones as well. At the same time, they promote a stark choice to those voters- vote Liberal or you get the Conservatives.

The opposition will cry foul, but what would the Liberals care about that. After a few days hit in the media, the interest will shift to the day by day match up as parties release their platforms. Jody Wilson-Raybould will be part of the campaign mutterings by the opposition, but a lot will get buried in the campaign.

Does it guarantee them a happy ending? Not at all, but what choice do the Liberals have? Hang in to October and get buried day after day with negative media coverage or go now and roll the dice.

It will be interesting to see what they do.


It Is CYA Time

The SNC-Lavalin scandal continues to expand with lots of twists and turns. Canadians are in for a real treat as the inner workings of the Trudeau government are going to be exposed.

As a result, it is CYA time- Cover Your Ass time! We will see a lot of that as anyone who is even remotely connected to this file will be analyzing every comment, decision, recommendation or email they sent or received on this file and that includes political and departmental staff.

It gets more complicated with the former Justice Minister and Attorney General threatening to speak out on how she feels she was pressured on this file. There will be lots of folks trying to justify their actions/involvement.

Keep in mind the RCMP can step in at any time if they think there might have been criminal wrong doing.

Today the Clerk of the Privy Council, the most second most powerful person in Ottawa (some would argue the most powerful) next to the Prime Minister and the person in charge of all federal civil servants was before the House Justice Committee.

If we ignore his inflammatory language which was probably a diversionary tactic IE what caught the media’s attention first, was it his assassination comment or the fact that he met with the Attorney General to discuss/review/ contemplate the SNC-Lavalin file.

The follow-up questions from the media should be:

  1. How many individual ministers did you meet with to discuss individual files since being appointed Clerk by Justin Trudeau?
  2. Name those files and ministers
  3. In each case who suggested to you (note not requested) that a meeting might be a good idea.
  4. How many ministers initiated the request for a meeting? How often did the “suggestion” come from PMO?
  5. Follow-up questions for any of those ministers who met with the Clerk should be how did you arrive at the decision to meet with the Clerk? Was it “suggested” as a good idea? Who by?

It is a red herring to suggest that Jody Wilson-Raybould had options such as going to the Ethics Commissioner if she felt pressured. What minister would every do that with the risk involved if it was ever made public?

I don’t know a single minister from my days on the Hill who would not feel a little bit intimated meeting with the Clerk of the Privy Council to discuss a file or meeting with senior PMO staff for that matter, especially if that minister felt PMO might not like their decision. Ministers hold their jobs at the pleasure of the PM- they know that all to well.

Let’s get to the bottom of it.

Why did this meeting even take place (the Attorney General has a deputy minister, who reports to the Clerk and senior political and departmental advisors who would have informed or briefed her on the pressure from the company, their lawyers or the Quebec government or PMO for that matter?

Page 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 97 Next 5 Entries »