Other Links

A Dumb Idea

Once again, we see Conservative staff being used as props or in today’s case more correctly as “disrupters” at a meeting.

This time it was at a meeting of the NATO Association where Liberal MPs banded together to remove a former Liberal, now Conservative MP, from the chair position.

Conservative staff proceeded to break out into song to disrupt the vote and proceedings. Eventually the security staff had to ask them to leave.

How stupid can the Conservatives be? Who thinks tactics like this up and who the hell thinks any of it will work? It is dumb, dumb, dumb.

Does anyone on the Conservative side think that the CPC in the last few years of the Harper government would not have acted in a similar manner to the Liberals to remove a Chairperson; if one of their members had bolted to the Liberal side.

It is politics, get over it.

By using their staff in such a manner, the staff became the story, not the removal of a very competent female Member of Parliament. Only partisans who drink their own Kool-Aid would think planning and then allowing this to happen was a bright idea.

The only good thing about this story is that outside of the Hill area, few Canadians will pay attention or give a damn about what happened.

Those that do pay attention will shake their head at how such childish behavior. This foolishness came from the party that claims to be ready to govern. Are they just not ready?

It is time to grow up and act like professionals if you want to win the trust and vote of Canadians.


Good Deal? Bad Deal?

A new agreement between the USA, Mexico and Canada has been reached. To their credit the Liberals managed to get it done. There is no point for anyone to be declaring it a better deal or worse one than the previous agreement.

Frankly it is far to early for anyone (including the opposition parties) to say if it is a good deal or a bad deal. Time will tell and probably not until after the election in 2019.

No one gets a big win in a negotiation session whether it’s on trade or any other item.

All parties have to win a bit and feel that they have made gains in some areas. To achieve that the other side has to give up a little. That is simply the way negotiations work. Ch19 was a big win for Canada and we gave a bit on dairy (not too many Canadians will complain about that).

There are other issues outside of the agreement to be resolved, but, going forward there is some goodwill now on both sides. What happens with these issues will help to determine if this is a good deal or not.

I don’t think anyone was surprised to see the usual knee jerk reaction from the Conservatives with Scheer saying this is a bad deal. But, there is NAFTA fatigue out there; the constant attempts by the media to play up the negotiations into some type of crisis have exhausted the public’s interest in this issue.

For nonpartisans who don’t live inside the Queensway, people just want this issue to go away now. Besides it won’t help the Conservatives to continue to support dairy supply management.


Goodbye Max

Well, as his nickname implies Mad Max has done it again and this time he has left the Conservative Party.

There is one thing that we can always count on in politics and it doesn’t matter if it is municipal, provincial or federal politics, and that is people’s egos.

There is always someone who is convinced that they are the next best thing in politics, if only the rest of the team would see it that way. Being full of your own importance isn’t that uncommon and it has ruined many a political career.

In the dog days of summer, when news is scarce, Bernier can attract attention. It will be a different game once the House returns and Bernier is just one more seat at the back of the room representing fewer voters than Elizabeth May.

Bernier is best remembered for his lost briefing book, but, I remember a poorly prepared minister scrambling to read his Question Period briefing book, just as the QP prep with the Prime Minister was to get under way and then stumbling over his answers when practice questions were directed his way. Not knowing your files is not the the stuff that Prime Ministers are made of and that was for one department not the whole government. I didn’t see prime ministerial material in him then and I don’t now.

Max can bask in the camera lights for now, but he will also have to deliver on a host of policy issues, raise funds, try to attract sitting MPs, find some good advisors, or change the ones he has now, and come up with enough followers to run candidates in at least Quebec, if not Canada.

I would wish Max good luck, but I will save that for Andrew Scheer and the Tory team when they take on Trudeau in 2019. Go Scheer Go!



Putting Max First, Party Second

Media reports have the Liberals saying that Max Bernier’s recent comments have led to a 77% increase in their fund raising- is anyone surprised by that?

Of course, his comments will help the Liberals and not his own party-did he think of that before posting his comments? Probably not, because this is all about Max, nothing here helps the Conservative Party.

The longer this goes on the more it looks like an attempt to box Scheer in before the Halifax convention. So what is Bernier planning there?

To use the phony excuse that what he is tweeting about was in his leadership platform or on a site a few years ago is hogwash. Leadership debates allow every candidate to express their views and put forward ideas that may differ from the official party position. But once it is over and you have lost, its time to take those sites and those comments down and rally around the new leader. You wanted to be the team leader and that didn’t happen so be a team player.

I am sure every party member in every party disagrees mildly or strongly with some part of their official party platform- that is normal. But, you rally around the leader and press on because it is not about you it is about the party and being a team player. There will be plenty of opportunities and policy reviews where you can express yourself. But that does not mean undermining your party’s positions and its leader in the lead up to an election.

I like Max and I even like some of his positions, but he is getting very bad advice from those around him on how he should proceed. My question is who is giving him advice and what’s in it for them?

This is not about allowing party members to speak up and discuss various positions as some have implied. There are lots of opportunities to do so- the Halifax meeting is but one example. This is looking more and more like an attempt to undermine Scheer.

In politics you have two ways of dealing with a defeated opponent- with one you give them a senior position as in keep your friends close and your enemies closer- the other…. Well I am sure you can figure that one out for yourself.

Scheer tried the first way, how did that turn out for him?


Another Bernier Bomb

Another Bernier bomb has burst on the scene this one on multiculturalism and diversity. It is too bad that he takes it upon himself to do these things, whether to get attention or to satisfy his ego. I like the guy and always have, but in politics you still must be a team player, unless you want to create your own team.

Bernier has left Scheer with little choice except to kick him out of caucus. Failure to do that will haunt the Conservatives in the next election (I can already imagine the election ads from both the Liberals and the NDP) and failure to do so will invite further attacks from the sideline that look more and more like attempts to undermine the authority of the leader, who won the leadership whether Bernier likes it or not. Now Conservatives and Canadians wait to see what Andrew Scheer does.

I was around when the Conservatives dealt with different aspects of multiculturalism and diversity and served as a Conservative ministerial Chief of Staff at Immigration, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. I have met with dozens of groups and communities, all so proud to be Canadians.

Conservative MP Erin O’Toole said it best on Twitter yesterday:

“There has been a lot of talk the last couple days about Canada’s diversity. Specifically, about how diversity is compatible with our Canadian identity.

Throughout Canadian history, Conservatives have routinely broken down ethnic and racial barriers in public life – helping establish Canada as one of the world’s most welcoming countries for newcomers.

Canada's first Chinese, Greek, Ukrainian, and Japanese MPs were Conservatives. Canada's first Korean, Pakistani, Filipino and Vietnamese Senators were also Conservatives, as were our first black, Sikh, Innu, and Inuk cabinet ministers and our first Muslim and Hindu MPs.  

Conservative governments also have a proud history of passing landmark legislation recognizing the diversity of backgrounds that have shaped our country. This includes Prime Minister John Diefenbaker’s Canadian Bill of Rights in 1960 and Prime Minister Brian Mulroney passing the first Multiculturalism Act in 1988.

Today our country faces challenges, but to suggest the challenges are because of “diversity” – either too much or too little – is simplistic & shows a disconnect with our past and present.

Canada is a successful country because we respect diversity and have had, by and large, a rules-based system that treats individuals fairly, regardless of their personal backgrounds. Conservatives have always understood this and will continue to fight to protect it.”

Page 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 94 Next 5 Entries »